Min PS-blogg
Välkomna till min, grundaren av Pottersajten, blogg. På denna blogg kommer jag att blogga om Internet och om utvecklingen av Pottersajten. Utanför Internets fasad är jag även intresserad av juridik, samhället och ekonomi. Det kanske ramlar in ett par andra inlägg med, vem vet!
USER_AVATAR
Jeb
Mästare (admin)
 
Inlägg: 392
Blev medlem: sön 02 mar 2008, 15:32
Ort: Stockholm
Blogg: Se blogg (0)
Arkiv
- mars 2012
Eurovision Song Contest 2012!
   sön 11 mar 2012, 00:50

+ augusti 2011
+ juli 2011
+ juni 2011
+ februari 2011
+ augusti 2010
+ juli 2010
+ juni 2010
+ maj 2010
+ mars 2010
+ februari 2010
+ januari 2010

Goodnight, Travel Well

Permanent länkav Jeb mån 01 mar 2010, 08:33

The unknown distance to the great beyond
Stares back at my grieving frame
To cast my shadow by the holy sun
My spirit moans with a sacred pain
And it's quiet now
The universe is standing still

There's nothing I can say
There's nothing we can do now
There's nothing I can say
There's nothing we can do now

And all that stands between the souls release ?
This temporary flesh and bone
We know that it's over now
I feel my faded mind begin to roam

Every time you fall
And every time you try
Every foolish dream
And every compromise
Every word you spoke
And everything you said
Everything you left me, rambles in my head

There's nothing I can say
There's nothing I can do now
There's nothing I can say
There's nothing I can do now

Up above the world so high

And everything you loved
And every time you try
Everybody's watching
Everybody cry

Stay, don't leave me
The stars can't for your sign
Don't signal now

And there's nothing I can say
There's nothing I can do now
There's nothing I can say
There's nothing we can do now

Goodnight, travel well
Goodnight, travel well

And there's nothing I can say
There's nothing I can do now

Grundaren av Pottersajten och administratör på Slottet.
44 kommentarer Läst 18313 gånger
Kommentarer
Nästa

Re: Goodnight, Travel Well

Permanent länkav Eilonwy fre 28 okt 2011, 22:32

Åh, den låten är så fiiiin!!!! <'3
"Even the darkest night will end and the sun will rise."
Användarvisningsbild
Eilonwy
Trolldomsminister
 
Inlägg: 6469
Blev medlem: sön 15 feb 2009, 15:12
Blogg: Se blogg (19)

zKImTgQqBMBi

Permanent länkav Anonymous ons 27 nov 2013, 00:36

the warmest year was 1998 and that later finndigs that recent years were the hottest are based on tiny differences much lower than margins of error, I would have preferred you to tell us why he might be wrong rather than see the posturing that occurred. Why?: its about the science. In one sense we should all be sceptics, and all good scientists are. And we should all hope that climate change fears are unfounded, and have been praying that Minchin's side had the better arguments. However, I believe, with a degree of but not absolute confidence, that those fears are justified, not because I have thoroughly studied or understand the science, but a) because of the apparent overwhelming weight of numbers of serious scientists pointing to the dangers, and b) because the simple explanation of the mechanism makes intuitive sense i.e. huge rise in emissions plus the greenhouse effect. Unfortunately, my brain is ageing and not so good at retaining the relevant bits of evidence. But I would have expected someone acting as an opinion leader in this field to be on top of that detail. By not doing so you came across as a true believer, uninterested in facts. The barely suppressed look of satisfaction on your face as your experts explained how serious climate change is and how its going to do bad things was, albeit understandable, indicative of exactly the thing that Minchin and many other sceptics suspect is at the heart of the climate change movement a leftwing or green desire to deindustrialise (though why he thinks the left is intrinsically anti-industrial I'm not sure the Soviet Union was a great example of worshiping industrial development and despoiling the environment worse than any advanced capitalist country.I'm probably being overly critical your heart is in the right place, and you are obviously very smart. As a lawyer you can no doubt master a brief, so I was a bit surprised to see the approach you took. Perhaps it was partly a result of editing? I'm just a bit fed up with the dialogue of the deaf on climate change which might as well be between fanatical religious groups or football fans. But we do need to get the facts right: the media experts should put up against experts,not interview them individually, nor should it be a debate between partisans. The truth (or perhaps more accurately, the probable degree of risk?) is the core question. If that risk is low, then we should be happy, and there is no need for action other than in terms of conservation of resources.. Remember coal isn't intrinsically bad (or good), despite local pollution effects: I'd be happy to phase it out if its a cause of climate change but we do need to remember, without coal there would have been no industrial revolution, and the technological basis to support a global population several times bigger than 200 years ago, with vastly better outcomes in terms of life expectancy, literacy, health, food security, life opportunities. (a whole other debate, but happy to have it).kind regardsJon Richardson
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

EPIrGEpfbqECODzqYqY

Permanent länkav Anonymous tor 28 nov 2013, 07:25

- Len, you totally roeckd this wedding. I love how the bridal party looks like they are floating in water in the group shots. The angle and perspective totally rules. Don't get me started on the intimate B&W images of the B&G!!! Love, love, love!!! Especially the large B&W vertical June 21, 2011 2:18 pm
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

NEyFIkvuWwmFkg

Permanent länkav Anonymous tor 28 nov 2013, 14:27

Hi Anna,I think your strategy was OK. I don't agree with the <a href="http://tuytfyfbbth.com">pepole</a> who say you should have debated Mr. Minchen's skeptics. Unless you have training in, or a gift for argument it is best to avoid such debates. Mr. Morano really wanted you to engage with him and if you had it is likely that he would have seemed to have won.I thought it was interesting that except for Professor Lindzen, Mr. Minchen chose communicators as his advocates instead of scientists. Maybe that is typical thinking for a politician. That is, it is more important to convince <a href="http://tuytfyfbbth.com">pepole</a> of your point of view than to demonstrate the reasons for your beliefs with evidence and analysis.Perhaps a better strategy would be to first educate Mr. Minchen in the workings of genuine scientific debate and then take him through the history of the science of climate change. Let him see the arguments and criticisms that led to the apparently overwhelming scientific consensus that exists today on the subject.General ignorance does not bother me too much. I am ignorant of many subjects myself. What really frightens and depresses me is to see politicians who fail to see obvious truths and fail to accept well made arguments. Their responsibility is perhaps too large for too much personal bias.I don't know what action should be taken on climate change but the effect of the denialists can only be to prevent any action. They will surely get their wish so we'd better hope they are right. I'm waiting to vote for anyone who seems to know what they are doing.In the meantime let us all cross our legs and cross our fingers. Less children and more luck.Oh, by the way Anna. When the paranoid bloggers made their own tape you asked them for assurances that they would not use the film to portray you in a bad light. I think they had exactly the same fears about the film you were making and in this age of modern journalism such fear is probably too often justified.Good luck!
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

pvdGtWmsMJh

Permanent länkav Anonymous lör 30 nov 2013, 05:03

- I bet it was the amazing the cat & mouse game they had tyinrg to avoid each other. I totally love this wedding, there is just so much joy. The bride could light up a room with her smile. Gorgeous. Wedding is rad to the max July 11, 2011 3:25 pm http://mdlvtv.com [url=http://lagxhadmgt.com]lagxhadmgt[/url] [link=http://wxfpocetxg.com]wxfpocetxg[/link]
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

QESdGtAnSsbXZ

Permanent länkav Anonymous lör 30 nov 2013, 15:53

Hi Anna, I too want our world (and my childrens world) to<a href="http://peioilhuyk.com"> suvvire</a>. But to be honest .I cannot buy it. Sure the CO2 levels have risen as shown by the data produced on the top of the mountain in Hawaii over the last Million years ..but what about the 399 million years before that? Were CO2 levels any higher then ? The answer is Yes, levels have been higher. Were there humans producing CO2 output at that time No there were not. It's all very nice to throw data around that scares ppl into a fenzy, and I know that ppl respond to that (as you do too), but then again there are dumb ppl and there are smart ones. It only takes ONE person to prove millions wrong..it will happen. I'm not sold on the whole thing as I believe propaganda is alive and well when it comes to this issue. I'll make my own mind up when somebody finally shows proof that man made CO2 output (that is 3% of the Earths NATURAL output) is affecting the climate. I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong but in the mean time maybe we should look at the Earths natural 97% of CO2 output and try to limit that?
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

mNxNZMWIQPl

Permanent länkav Anonymous tis 08 apr 2014, 16:08

the warmest year was 1998 and that later figndnis that recent years were the hottest are based on tiny differences much lower than margins of error, I would have preferred you to tell us why he might be wrong rather than see the posturing that occurred. Why?: its about the science. In one sense we should all be sceptics, and all good scientists are. And we should all hope that climate change fears are unfounded, and have been praying that Minchin's side had the better arguments. However, I believe, with a degree of but not absolute confidence, that those fears are justified, not because I have thoroughly studied or understand the science, but a) because of the apparent overwhelming weight of numbers of serious scientists pointing to the dangers, and b) because the simple explanation of the mechanism makes intuitive sense i.e. huge rise in emissions plus the greenhouse effect. Unfortunately, my brain is ageing and not so good at retaining the relevant bits of evidence. But I would have expected someone acting as an opinion leader in this field to be on top of that detail. By not doing so you came across as a true believer, uninterested in facts. The barely suppressed look of satisfaction on your face as your experts explained how serious climate change is and how its going to do bad things was, albeit understandable, indicative of exactly the thing that Minchin and many other sceptics suspect is at the heart of the climate change movement a leftwing or green desire to deindustrialise (though why he thinks the left is intrinsically anti-industrial I'm not sure the Soviet Union was a great example of worshiping industrial development and despoiling the environment worse than any advanced capitalist country.I'm probably being overly critical your heart is in the right place, and you are obviously very smart. As a lawyer you can no doubt master a brief, so I was a bit surprised to see the approach you took. Perhaps it was partly a result of editing? I'm just a bit fed up with the dialogue of the deaf on climate change which might as well be between fanatical religious groups or football fans. But we do need to get the facts right: the media experts should put up against experts,not interview them individually, nor should it be a debate between partisans. The truth (or perhaps more accurately, the probable degree of risk?) is the core question. If that risk is low, then we should be happy, and there is no need for action other than in terms of conservation of resources.. Remember coal isn't intrinsically bad (or good), despite local pollution effects: I'd be happy to phase it out if its a cause of climate change but we do need to remember, without coal there would have been no industrial revolution, and the technological basis to support a global population several times bigger than 200 years ago, with vastly better outcomes in terms of life expectancy, literacy, health, food security, life opportunities. (a whole other debate, but happy to have it).kind regardsJon Richardson
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

XnNNwXwiOku

Permanent länkav Anonymous tis 08 apr 2014, 16:29

Still in beta. Too many changes that need to be teetsd. v3.0.5b Thanks to Keytwo Why's Lazyest Gallery for the inspiration. I have redone the Options Pages. I think they look nice. I also had to rename all the options, so I could split the page across two. Brave testers out there have fun. wilbur
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

KvQCxfFLmOK

Permanent länkav Anonymous ons 09 apr 2014, 02:14

Ja, visst gillar vi (stenhe5rt<a href="http://zwdurspmi.com"> dsusetom</a>!) att jag hamnar under den kategorin bloggar! Tjohoo! :P Jag har ett par Isa-tavlor he4r hemma som jag fullkomligt e4lskar! Nu har jag bara lite beslutse5ngest f6ver vad jag ska beste4lla ff6r mitt presentkort... :P Vill ju ha se5 me5nga! :D
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

NEMIkXkKqMnZHwW

Permanent länkav Anonymous ons 09 apr 2014, 07:44

Hi Anna,I think your strategy was OK. I don't agree with the<a href="http://noftdwcd.com"> pploee</a> who say you should have debated Mr. Minchen's skeptics. Unless you have training in, or a gift for argument it is best to avoid such debates. Mr. Morano really wanted you to engage with him and if you had it is likely that he would have seemed to have won.I thought it was interesting that except for Professor Lindzen, Mr. Minchen chose communicators as his advocates instead of scientists. Maybe that is typical thinking for a politician. That is, it is more important to convince<a href="http://noftdwcd.com"> pploee</a> of your point of view than to demonstrate the reasons for your beliefs with evidence and analysis.Perhaps a better strategy would be to first educate Mr. Minchen in the workings of genuine scientific debate and then take him through the history of the science of climate change. Let him see the arguments and criticisms that led to the apparently overwhelming scientific consensus that exists today on the subject.General ignorance does not bother me too much. I am ignorant of many subjects myself. What really frightens and depresses me is to see politicians who fail to see obvious truths and fail to accept well made arguments. Their responsibility is perhaps too large for too much personal bias.I don't know what action should be taken on climate change but the effect of the denialists can only be to prevent any action. They will surely get their wish so we'd better hope they are right. I'm waiting to vote for anyone who seems to know what they are doing.In the meantime let us all cross our legs and cross our fingers. Less children and more luck.Oh, by the way Anna. When the paranoid bloggers made their own tape you asked them for assurances that they would not use the film to portray you in a bad light. I think they had exactly the same fears about the film you were making and in this age of modern journalism such fear is probably too often justified.Good luck!
Anonymous
Mugglare
 
Inlägg: 22
Blev medlem: mån 17 dec 2007, 23:52

Vilka är online

Medlemmar online: Google [Bot]

cron